You'd better be a Small Business! We account for 99.7% of exporters in the US.
YouTube
Lip-Syncing Could Become Criminal: Lord Help the YouTubes
Thursday, June 16, 2011 - 1:41pmThis blog was written by our wonderful legal intern, Miss Brooke Perrone, with contributions from me as Editor-in-Chief, I suppose. Enjoy!
A bill currently before the U.S. Senate contains broad statutory language that, as it stands, would criminalize any person that performs a copyrighted work publicly. That is, basically anything outside of your living room in front of family and friends. This includes private parties where the venues ...
Lip-Syncing Could Become Criminal: Lord Help the YouTubes
Thursday, June 16, 2011 - 1:41pmThis blog was written by our wonderful legal intern, Miss Brooke Perrone, with contributions from me as Editor-in-Chief, I suppose. Enjoy!
A bill currently before the U.S. Senate contains broad statutory language that, as it stands, would criminalize any person that performs a copyrighted work publicly. That is, basically anything outside of your living room in front of family and friends. This includes private parties where the venues ...
Lip-Syncing Could Become Criminal: Lord Help the YouTubes
Thursday, June 16, 2011 - 1:41pmThis blog was written by our wonderful legal intern, Miss Brooke Perrone, with contributions from me as Editor-in-Chief, I suppose. Enjoy!
A bill currently before the U.S. Senate contains broad statutory language that, as it stands, would criminalize any person that performs a copyrighted work publicly. That is, basically anything outside of your living room in front of family and friends. This includes private parties where the venues ...
Lip-Syncing Could Become Criminal: Lord Help the YouTubes
Thursday, June 16, 2011 - 1:41pmThis blog was written by our wonderful legal intern, Miss Brooke Perrone, with contributions from me as Editor-in-Chief, I suppose. Enjoy!
A bill currently before the U.S. Senate contains broad statutory language that, as it stands, would criminalize any person that performs a copyrighted work publicly. That is, basically anything outside of your living room in front of family and friends. This includes private parties where the venues ...
Viacom v. Google – It’s Cool, I Read It So You Don’t Have To.
Tuesday, June 29, 2010 - 2:23pmYes, I am fully aware that is not a grammatically correct sentence. However, I think it gets my point across! If you’re interested in copyright at all (or, if you read any online news source at all), you’re probably aware that Google beat the crap out of Viacom this week in a copyright infringement suit based on the Safe Harbor Provision (17 USC §512). But what effect does this have on copyright owners? On the dissemination of information and art on...
Viacom v. Google – It’s Cool, I Read It So You Don’t Have To.
Tuesday, June 29, 2010 - 2:23pmYes, I am fully aware that is not a grammatically correct sentence. However, I think it gets my point across! If you’re interested in copyright at all (or, if you read any online news source at all), you’re probably aware that Google beat the crap out of Viacom this week in a copyright infringement suit based on the Safe Harbor Provision (17 USC §512). But what effect does this have on copyright owners? On the dissemination of information and art on...
Viacom v. Google – It’s Cool, I Read It So You Don’t Have To.
Tuesday, June 29, 2010 - 2:23pmYes, I am fully aware that is not a grammatically correct sentence. However, I think it gets my point across! If you’re interested in copyright at all (or, if you read any online news source at all), you’re probably aware that Google beat the crap out of Viacom this week in a copyright infringement suit based on the Safe Harbor Provision (17 USC §512). But what effect does this have on copyright owners? On the dissemination of information and art on...
Viacom v. Google – It’s Cool, I Read It So You Don’t Have To.
Tuesday, June 29, 2010 - 2:23pmYes, I am fully aware that is not a grammatically correct sentence. However, I think it gets my point across! If you’re interested in copyright at all (or, if you read any online news source at all), you’re probably aware that Google beat the crap out of Viacom this week in a copyright infringement suit based on the Safe Harbor Provision (17 USC §512). But what effect does this have on copyright owners? On the dissemination of information and art on...
Viacom v. Google – It’s Cool, I Read It So You Don’t Have To.
Tuesday, June 29, 2010 - 2:23pmYes, I am fully aware that is not a grammatically correct sentence. However, I think it gets my point across! If you’re interested in copyright at all (or, if you read any online news source at all), you’re probably aware that Google beat the crap out of Viacom this week in a copyright infringement suit based on the Safe Harbor Provision (17 USC §512). But what effect does this have on copyright owners? On the dissemination of information and art on...
